|
|
SZA
Client Case Studies
Breakthrough
client case studies that help organizations realize reward strategies
Periodically
we’ll call your attention to what we consider breakthrough client
outcomes that not only add value to the client’s business but also add
to the body of knowledge relating to alignment of employee pay and rewards
with practical business tactics and goals.
Giant Eagle
Giant
Eagle is a market-dominant East Coast grocery chain that employs 30,000
mostly-unionized retail grocery workers. The company is privately owned
and has grown market share consistently year after year. It has
demonstrated the ability to grow in a highly competitive and traditionally
low-margin business where it has been successful competing with major
non-union supercenters and warehouse clubs having a less expensive
workforce and no burden of restrictive work rules hindering workforce
flexibility and adaptability.
Jack Flanagan (then Executive Vice President, Retail Operations) believed
that for the company to improve on key dimensions, including customer
satisfaction, the unionized workforce had to become stakeholders in the
success of the stores in which they work. This meant that they must share
in the financial performance of the store as measured in terms of customer
satisfaction, store sales performance, and controllable cost. Because the
focus was on the store, company profit sharing or broad-based gainsharing
was not viewed as a viable alternative. Private ownership made stock in
the company unavailable at that time.
Giant Eagle’s Chairman and President joined Flanagan and other
executives to develop an incentive strategy with the goal of aligning
unionized employees with key measures of success at the store level.
Measures of customer satisfaction, sales, and cost were selected as
paramount. Union pay was traditionally based entirely on tenure, and the
stores struggled with restrictive work rules dictated by many years of
negotiations. Differences in store performance had not impacted how store
employees were paid—they were not stakeholders in the success of the
store, and their rewards were not tied to how an individual store or Giant
Eagle in general performed. The strategy called for the design of an
incentive plan that focused performance on key goals. Although Giant Eagle
is able to measure nearly all aspects of store performance, a commitment
was made to add measurement tools if these were needed to make the
incentive plan more viable.
Giant Eagle store managers and staff managers comprised an incentive
design team to work with Flanagan and SZA in developing the incentive plan
to match the strategy. The design team devised a way to more effectively
gather and apply customer input at the individual store level and
developed operational measures to ensure a positive cost/benefit
relationship between dollars expended on incentives and value added to the
store. When the incentive paid off, both employees and the store gain
measurably.
The result was an incentive plan based on individual store goals or key
performance measures. Measures and goals were communicated throughout the
stores, and a monthly check was paid based on goal achievement. This is a
key breakthrough in the use of performance incentives in a unionized
retail grocery workplace:
|
 |
Strategy and tactics, goals
and outcomes for the new incentive plan developed by a
management design team
|
|
 |
Strategy to tie unionized
employee performance to changes in key indicators of store
performance sponsored by top management
|
|
 |
Key measures of customer
satisfaction, sales, and cost at the store level to show that
incentive payments added value to individual store performance
|
|
 |
Team incentive plan for
store hourly employees based on key performance goals achieved
at the store level
|
|
 |
Standards of performance for
setting store-by-store goals
|
|
 |
Communications,
implementation, and management techniques for the ongoing
management of the incentive process
|
|
 |
Cost/benefit analysis to
demonstrate that dollars expended on incentives help stores meet
their goals
|
The
communications strategy is significant and continuing. Gaining commitment
from a large unionized workforce to the key measures of store performance
requires strong leadership and management sponsorship. Giant Eagle
envisions a complete transition to take several years and much training
and nurturing as incentives and new customer measures become a new way of
life for store employees.
Public Utility
District No. 1 of Chelan County
Chelan
County PUD is the second largest non-federal hydroelectric utility in the
United States. Their customer/owners enjoy what are among the lowest
electric rates in the country, and the organization is a proven performer
in terms of quality, fiscal responsibility, and customer relations.
Periodically the utility looks at compensation. Early discussions with the
leadership team indicated that Chelan PUD wanted more than just a
competitive review of compensation practices. Instead, it wanted a reward
solution that was focused on its customer/owners.
Charles Hosken, General Manager, along with his executive leadership team
and SZA developed a strategy to align the total pay of salaried nonexempt,
exempt, and management (and represented workers as well) with the 14 most
essential measures of success the District must deliver to customers
annually. Being a public electric utility, the organization can publicly
and openly communicate its customer-focused goals and show customer/owners
how it is doing compared to these goals. The newly designed total
compensation program takes advantage of this ability.
A management design team of directors and managers were chartered by the
compensation strategy and Hosken. This team worked with SZA to develop,
communicate, and implement all elements of the program. This involved a
significant change from the prior program that was based on internal
equity, was much less focused on performance, and didn’t emphasize the
key measures and goals that typify what customer/owners of a public
electric utility expect from their District’s workforce.
The results were lauded by the public and PUD Commissioners. The elements
of total pay at Chelan PUD are clear benchmark results in public electric
utilities and also among public organizations in general:
|
 |
Strategic reward direction
reflective of a customer-focused public electric utility
|
|
 |
Pay for performance
throughout the organization based on cascading customer goals to
which all employees are committed
|
|
 |
Base pay levels determined
by competitive practice and a four broadbanded system to
encourage growth of competencies and skills from within
|
|
 |
Pay adjustments based on an
individual’s value added
|
|
 |
Annual incentives based on
the 14 customer goals and a promise of no electric rate
increases during the foreseeable future
|
|
 |
Performance management
focused on the achievement of cascading goals, the competencies
needed to grow in a customer-focused electric utility, and
development
|
|
 |
Recognition program to
parallel the cash compensation program to acknowledge individual
and team excellence on the spot
|
|
 |
Effective communications,
rollout, and continuing education to ensure a solid and
sustained transition to the new program
|
The program is unique among public electric
utilities. An article written by Chelan PUD employees Elaine Gentilo and
Kirk Hudson and SZA for the American Public Power Association (APPA)
journal People to People (Summer 2003, Vol. 3 Issue
2) focuses on the results of this effort. (Click here to read
article Customer-First
Rewards: New Performance Directions for Public Power [pdf]).
|